Subscribe via Email!

Subscribe to CalDistressed and get all new posts via e-mail.
Name:
Email Marketing by WP Autoresponder

TwitterCounter

Archives

Networked Blogs

Posts Tagged ‘legislation’

Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers

If you’ve been watching the debate in Washington, DC over the payroll tax, and if you are like most people, you probably have been wanted to see Congress get its act together and pass a bill. After all, I don’t know anyone – rich or poor – who is enthralled with the idea that their payroll taxes could go up starting January 1st. But what you may not know is that if you are in the market for a new home, or if you are thinking about refinancing an existing home, the bill that was passed by the Senate last week is going to cost you. That’s right, the bill would transfer the cost of the payroll tax cut directly to those borrowing for a mortgage.

Buried within the bill passed by the Senate is a provision to increase the fees associated with federally guaranteed loans. But unlike the tax cut extension, which would currently only be for two months, and would only save the average family $166 in that time span, the fee increases would be permanent and for the life of the loan. The fees are specifically included to offset the costs of the tax cut extension.

The new fees would amount to an increase in monthly payments of $7.50 per $100,000 borrowed. In the Los Angeles area, especially in higher priced neighborhoods, the fees will translate into thousands of additional dollars that borrowers will have to pay over the life of their loan. For instance, on a $500,000 loan, borrowers would have to pay an additional $450 per year. Over a 30 year mortgage, that amounts to $13,500 in additional costs to the borrower.

Transferring the costs of the payroll tax cut to borrowers is an amazingly stupid idea for a number of reasons. Apparently the members of Congress for this missed a portion of the five years in which the beginning of the financial crisis started with a collapse in housing. They must have also missed the many recent reports that show that new home starts are very week. Since new home construction is a bellwether for economic growth and employment growth, it really doesn’t make any economic sense to impose fees that will only further depress the housing market.

The fees are also a bad idea because they would have a relatively small portion of society paying for a tax decrease that benefits everyone. Logic would dictate that there is a more equitable way to spread the cost of paying for the tax cut. Perhaps… I don’t know… they could pay for them by simply cutting government spending in other areas.

In any case, if you are thinking of buying a home, now would be a very good time to do so and lock in your loan. There is a very good chance that these fee increases will actually go into effect very soon. If you don’t want to get stuck paying thousands of dollars for a $166 tax cut, you need to move quickly. Roughly 9 out of every 10 mortgages issued by banks will be impacted by the new law if it does go into effect.

Share and Enjoy

  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Cost of Payroll Tax Cut to be Paid for by Mortgage Borrowers

Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.

For some time now, anytime anyone asks me how real estate went from boom to bust almost overnight, my answer has been, “Look at Congress.” I know that a lot of people disagree with me on this. In fact, I would say that most of the time I give my answer, I get an argument which blames the banks, greed, corporate America… the list goes on. But as I see it, Congress passed the laws that allowed these other factors to come into play.

It may sound simplistic but if Congress hadn’t deregulated banking, usurped state gambling laws that made credit default swaps illegal, or encouraged banks and the FED to come up with ways to make loans to unqualified buyers, then we wouldn’t be where we are today.

But what was in it for members of Congress? Why would they have approved all of these new laws? Well, there are a number of answers and none of them are good. They typically range from a lack of knowledge regarding economic history to lobbying. But one other reason that doesn’t come up too much is corruption.

An article in the Washington Times shows that political corruption may very well have played a role in the melt-down of real estate markets. Rep. Darrel Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is asking the House Ethics Committee to investigate four representatives. The unnamed congressmen (or women) may have received substantially discounted home loans from Countrywide Mortgage; now a part of Bank of America.

This isn’t the first time that this has come up. Countrywide provided discounted loans to several members of the Senate. Now it appears that House members were also involved.

Although the members being investigated have not been named publically, they are a bipartisan group including one Democrat and three Republicans. Nice to know that they can cooperate on something, isn’t it?

Share and Enjoy

  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Where Did the Real Estate Crisis Come From? Just Look at Congress.

Fairness in Foreclosure Act – A Really Bad Idea From Congress

Representative Ed Towns (D-NY) is proposing a new law that is gleefully titled the Fairness in Foreclosure Act (FIFA), according to DS News. The law place serious restrictions on lender lawsuits for deficiency judgments and it would change what lenders can report to the credit reporting agencies. As with all things too good to be true, this proposal would lead to unintended consequences. Among those that are foreseeable, reduced access to credit for borrowers and higher interest rates.

Currently, the window during which a lender may pursue a deficiency judgment varies by state and can be anywhere from six months to six years.

 

The Fairness in Foreclosure Act (H.R. 3566) would prohibit lenders from pursuing deficiency judgments more than 12 months after foreclosure, except in states with shorter windows for deficiency judgments.

The law apparently doesn’t make any exceptions for anyone who lied to obtain their loan or who engaged in any other form of fraud. It would also place serious restrictions on deficiency judgments for low income families. Again, no exceptions are being made for fraud.

More importantly,

Additionally, if the amount secured through foreclosure sale does not recover the full amount owed to the lender, the bank would not be allowed to report the deficiency to consumer reporting agencies as an unpaid debt from the borrower.

Very simply, this means that lenders will not be able to look at a credit report and determine the risk of lending. And that means that lenders will be forced to increase interest rates and fees for everyone. In turn, that will mean reduced home prices and increase documentation for borrowers.

Hopefully, the bill will never make it out of committee.

Share and Enjoy

  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress
  • wp socializer sprite mask 32px Fairness in Foreclosure Act   A Really Bad Idea From Congress